Àá½Ã¸¸ ±â´Ù·Á ÁÖ¼¼¿ä. ·ÎµùÁßÀÔ´Ï´Ù.

¹Ì·¡ÁöÇâÀûÀÎ °üÁ¡¿¡¼­ÀÇ º» Ä¡¾Æ¿ì½ÄÁõ ¿¹¹æ°ú À½¿ë¼ö ºÒ¼ÒÈ­

Prospective On Prevention of Dental Caries and Water Fluoridation

´ëÇÑÄ¡°úÀÇ»çÇùȸÁö 2000³â 38±Ç 1È£ p.86 ~ 93
¹Ú±âö, ±è¿Ï±Ô,
¼Ò¼Ó »ó¼¼Á¤º¸
¹Ú±âö (  ) - ´ö¼º¿©ÀÚ´ëÇб³ ¾àÇдëÇÐ ¾à¹°ÇнÇ
±è¿Ï±Ô (  ) - ´ö¼º¿©ÀÚ´ëÇб³ ¾àÇдëÇÐ ¾à¹°ÇнÇ

Abstract


Water fluoridation in conjunction with wide use of fluoride dentifrices has been a major factor
responsible for the decline in dental caries during the second half of the 20th century throughout
the world. The history of water fluoridation is a classic public health program leading to epidemiologic
investigation and community-based public health dentistry program.
Although other fluoride-containing products are available, water fluoridation remains as the
most safe and cost-effective method of delivering fluoride to most communities, regardless of age,
educational attainment, orincome levels. This review deals with pros and cons of water fluoridation
and prospective analysis of state-of-the-art on issues related to the use of fluoried. An
"optimal" fluoride concentration of 0.7-1.2 ppm has been recommended for preventing dental caries
with a minimal dental fluorosis and no systemic health consequences.

Å°¿öµå

¿ø¹® ¹× ¸µÅ©¾Æ¿ô Á¤º¸

 

µîÀçÀú³Î Á¤º¸

KCI